SCOTLAND’S biggest local authority has revealed plans to introduce fees for pre-application planning advice for the first time.
Glasgow City Council (GCC) said the proposals to charge for the advice, which until now has been given free by its planning officials to developers and agents to help them prepare planning applications, will bring it into line with a growing number of local authorities across Scotland.
It is understood that 12 of Scotland’s 32 local authorities now charge for the advice, some of which have been doing so since 2005, with Edinburgh and Stirling among the most recent additions.
The Glasgow authority’s city administration committee is scheduled to consider a report on the proposal on September 17.
READ MORE: Landmark Glasgow Portcullis House site sold for development of 750 residential units by Watkin Jones
Although there is no legislative requirement to seek advice before planning applications are submitted, the council noted that pre-planning guidance helps ensure applications proceed as smoothly as possible, and allows developers to save costs.
GCC has not disclosed a structure for the proposed fees, but noted that the charges would vary according to the complexity of the project.
City of Edinburgh Council charges £200 plus valued added tax (VAT) for a “standard service” on a small development of up to 11 homes or 999 square metres of commercial space. The cost for a standard service on a major or national development, involving five meetings with a case officer, is £4,900 plus VAT. As an example of a major development, the Edinburgh authority cites a two-plus hectare site, which may be earmarked for 50-plus homes, 10,000 square metres of class 4,5 or 6 space, or 5,000 square metres of mixed or other space.
There are around 100 people working in the Glasgow planning team, with around 36 employees providing pre-application advice on a full-time equivalent basis.
A spokesman for GCC said: “The pre-application advice service has operated successfully for a number of years, providing customers with greater certainty on the likely outcome of, and key issues that need to be addressed within, a future application for planning permission. This advice can be given by the planning authority for any type and scale of development within the city – from householder to major development.”
READ MORE: Revealed: Major jobs boost for Scotland's biggest local authority
The spokesman added: “Although non-statutory, it is widely recognised that pre-application planning advice can be a valuable step within the development process. It can help give applicants confidence that their proposal may be supported (or otherwise) before costly commitments are made with the preparation and submission of a planning application.”
Gillian Stewart, chair of the British Council for Offices in Scotland, and a director of Michael Laird Architects, broadly welcomed the Glasgow proposals, noting that any move from “informal” advice offered by planners to “robust” and “defendable” guidance is positive from a developer’s standpoint. She said: “We feel it is probably a good thing. The benefit we see from a design perspective is that it gives you a constructive dialogue at a very early stage.”
Ms Stewart, who emphasised that she was speaking from a design perspective, added: “As long as it (the fee) is affordable and the advice is worth the money, and adds value to the process. It saves multiple iterations of design development. It would give designers a much clearer steer and I am sure that developers would be happy with that too.”
She noted: “Anything that gives meaningful dialogue, and is recorded, would add value, as long as the fee is not huge.”
Fiona Gordon, managing associate in the planning and infrastructure consenting team at law firm Addleshaw Goddard, said: “Proactive and pragmatic developers already engage with their local planning authorities at an early stage anyway but, for the most part, developers tend to welcome a more formal pre-application service if it results in increased or improved resources being put towards their application.
“Pre-application engagement has the benefit of ironing out potential issues at the start of the process, rather than facing the prospect of unexpected difficulties or new issues being introduced further down the line, which could ultimately prove more costly and time consuming.
But Ms Gordon added: “Major applications already cost six-figure fees – effectively an investment in local authority decision making – however there is not always a well-resourced pre-application service whatever the expectation.
“The requirement for a further significant fee would need to be met with some clear service priorities.”
The move by GCC comes as major developments are still going ahead in Glasgow despite the challenges created by coronavirus. The council said yesterday that the current level of developer interest and application submissions are essentially the same as they were one year ago.
Landmark building Portcullis House, at 21 India Street, was acquired last month by build-to-rent developer Watkin Jones. It plans to create 750 residential units, though the site had been earmarked for a potential hotel when it first came on to the market in the spring.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel