By Ian McConnell
ONE-quarter of UK businesses with furloughed staff have said they cannot afford to contribute any amount to the cost of the UK Government’s coronavirus job retention scheme between August and October.
This difficulty for firms, revealed in a survey of nearly 700 directors conducted between May 20 and 27, raises the spectre of heavy job losses. The survey, by the Institute of Directors, shows around half of businesses using the job retention scheme for their staff could provide 20 per cent or more of furloughed workers’ full-time salaries between August and October.
Under the scheme, the UK Government currently pays 80% of the wages and salaries of furloughed workers up to £2,500 a month. Although he announced an extension of the scheme to October earlier this month, Chancellor Rishi Sunak highlighted plans to ask employers to contribute to the cost from August.
READ MORE: Ian McConnell: Venetian and Scottish Borders stories flag challenges on painstaking road ahead
More than one-third of those using the job retention scheme said they would bring the majority of their furloughed workers back part-time, if this were allowed by the programme. Less than one in ten said they would not bring anyone back part-time.
The IoD said that, “to protect jobs”, there must be “as much flexibility as possible in the system”. It noted the majority of those polled with staff on furlough said they “would make use of shorter minimum furlough periods if allowed”. It added: “Currently, workers must be on furlough for at least three weeks, making it difficult for firms to react to uncertain demand.”
Malcolm Cannon, national director of IoD Scotland, said: “The furlough scheme has been a lifeline for hundreds of businesses and workers across Scotland, but our members have made it clear that when the support ends in August jobs will be lost. Just as when the extension to furlough was announced...clarity will be needed for devolved governments to ensure businesses...do not lose out on support, given the disparities between lockdown end dates.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel