ROYAL Dutch Shell boss Ben van Beurden has seen the value of his pay package fall by 50 per cent but still earned total remuneration of around £8.7 million last year.
The oil and gas giant’s annual report shows Mr van Beurden’s total remuneration dropped by around £9m last year, from £17.8m in 2018, following a fall in the value of his performance-related awards.
North Sea in focus as fall in crude price gathers pace amid market turmoil
In the annual report Shell said its remuneration committee felt Mr van Beurden’s total pay represented a fair level of remuneration, taking into account the company’s strong competitive performance from 2017 to 2019.
It said a significant bonus reduction in 2019, to €0.8m (£0.7m) from €3m, reflected factors such as the number of fatalities and safety challenges experienced by the group as well as a drop in the amount of cash it generated from operations.
The report said Shell operates with a clear purpose and well-defined strategic intents that balance societal progress with performance under Mr van Beurden. He continues to lead the way in the energy debate externally, for example by “galvanising coalitions to start action on sectoral decarbonisation” in fields such as aviation.
However, the report said the group’s HSSE (health, safety, security and environment) performance was mixed last year.
It noted: “The (seven) fatalities in Shell operated ventures in 2019 are unacceptable and provide a stark reminder of the need for an ongoing focus on safety.”
The total remuneration of Shell’s chief financial officer Jesscica Uhl increased to around £5.3m in 2019 from £4.3m.
Shell’s total net income before tax fell to $25.5 billion (£20bn) in 2019 from $35.6bn following a fall in oil and gas prices during the year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here