TRUTH be told we haven't done much to address unfair rents for over a century in Scotland.
The 1965 Rent Act introduced a comprehensive system of fair rents across the UK anchored in local market rents. This system was updated and repeated for Scotland in the 1984 Rent (Scotland) Act.
The test of a fair rent in section 48 of the 1984 Act was determined in relation to the current rents of comparable property, having regard to the age, character and locality of the dwelling-house in question. The problem with open market fairness is if all landlords put their rents up, tough luck, everyone has to pay more. Fairness doesn't come into free market economics.
In 1988, the Thatcher Government wanted to encourage an expansion of the private rented sector (PRS) so rent control was deregulated along with the removal of security of tenure for tenants. In 1999, the Scottish PRS represented 5% of all households. In the last 15 years it has trebled in size and now accounts for over 15% of all Scottish homes.
When the Scottish Government introduced its 2016 Private Tenancies (Housing) (Scotland) Act to provide more security of tenure for tenants it fell into an old trap on fair rents. Section 32 of 2016 Act is essentially a revamp of the open market fairness test of 1965. The Scottish Government’s new thinking was to introduce the ability of local authorities to apply for a rent pressure zone (RPZ).
Two problems with RPZs. Not one council has ever applied for one. It could be suggested they never will as no-one collects the PRS data required to do so. Second, even if there was an RPZ it would only restrict rent increases to inflation plus one percent – the consumer price index (CPI) - plus whatever a rent officer thought was fair on top of that.
Last year the average rent increase across Greater Glasgow was 5.8%, while CPI was 1.3%. If we consider the Lothians and Greater Glasgow over the last nine years, PRS rents have increased by 40%. That’s double the rate of inflation.The Scottish Government’s action on fair rents hasn’t worked. It’s irrelevant.
What worked over a hundred years ago was a rent cap. When the First World War began landlords took advantage of the pressure on housing supply by profiteering with massive rent hikes.
Women’s movements were formed across Glasgow with the first active resistance in Govan, led by Mary Barbour. They were successful. They secured the introduction of the 1915 Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (War Restrictions) Act. This ground-breaking legislation retrospectively capped and froze rents at August 1914 prices for the duration of the war and for a period thereafter.
Economic or regulatory price caps are not as unusual as you might think. Our energy regulator, Ofgem, has the power to cap energy prices. The UK minimum wage is of course a wage floor cap. A few years ago, HM Treasury allowed the Financial Conduct Authority to introduce a price cap for short-term-credit to tackle the excessive profits being made on pay-day loans, and the over indebtedness of consumers with repeated roll-overs of loans.
The fastest growth in severe poverty in Scotland has been in the PRS. 50,000 children are in severe poverty in the Scottish PRS. The recent report on UK poverty by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) confirms that Scotland has a lower overall poverty rate than England or Wales.
The JRF note that "the difference in rates between Scotland and the rest of the UK is mainly due to lower rents in the social housing sector as well as Scotland having a higher proportion of social rented properties". Affordable rents is essential to reducing poverty and human misery in our society.
Since 1980, half a million council and housing association homes in Scotland were lost through the right to buy scheme. Many of these homes are now in the PRS. Scotland's PRS isn't building new homes, it's recycling former council and housing association stock for the pursuit of profiteering at the expense of those least able to afford it.
We need change. We need to fix the power imbalance in our society if we are to meaningfully tackle poverty and social injustice.
Govan Law Centre is backing Pauline McNeil MSP’s Fair Rent (Scotland) Bill, and I’m happy to help Pauline draft her Bill and accompanying documents over the next few weeks.
Pauline’s proposed Bill would cap PRS rents at no more than CPI plus one percent per annum. It would introduce an objective legal mechanism for rent to be lowered where it was unfair and unjust. It would require private landlords to disclose all of their rent charges at the point of re-registration as a landlord, in order for a full dataset of the sector to become available. It would empower tenants to challenge unfair rents.
Mike Dailly is solicitor advocate and principal solicitor of Govan Law Centre
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here