ENQUEST’s experience with the venerable Magnus field could encourage hopes the shake-up in the North Sea may be good news for an area that seemed to be in rapid decline.
EnQuest bought Magnus in 2018 from BP, which cut its exposure to large areas of the North Sea amid the downturn triggered from the crude price plunge from 2014.
Oil firm highlights 'significant' North Sea opportunity
This left a range of majors feeling there was little point in investing in projects involving mature North Sea fields that could not have a material impact on their earnings.
BP and Shell decided to focus spending on bumper projects they reckoned could be in production for years, including a handful West of Shetland.
Chevron and ConocoPhillips are shifting billions of dollars investment from the North Sea to the shale fields of their home country, in which operating costs are lower than off the UK.
But outside the ranks of the giants, the likes of EnQuest and Premier Oil have shown they can achieve good returns from investing in assets bought from bigger fish in recent years.
North Sea fields help oil and gas stalwart generate huge amounts of cash
New players such as Chrysaor Energy have won multi-billion backing from international financiers for expansion drives that will involve investing heavily in North Sea assets acquired from majors.
While there has been a partial recovery in the oil price since late 2016, amid moves by big exporters to curb output, the prospects of a return to the boom conditions seen early in the decade remain remote. However, the price may have risen to a level that could prompt a range of firms that bought assets amid the downturn to support a meaningful increase in North Sea field development and upgrade activity.
Some majors may have completed the bulk of their rationalisation work but the shake up in the North Sea has a way to run.
America’s ExxonMobil is thought to be preparing to sell a $2bn North Sea portfolio.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here