A STUDY has found commercial shooting is unlikely to resume at a Scottish Borders moor.
Despite a recovery in grouse numbers at Langholm Moor, it was found not to be enough to sustain a business.
The Langholm Moor Demonstration Project was set up to establish whether the moor could be recovered as a national and local asset, supporting grouse populations for driven grouse shooting, birds of prey in an internationally important protected area for hen harrier, and to deliver other wider biodiversity.
Individual elements of the project were described as “markedly successful”, including addressing decades of heather loss.
Although the grouse population recovered in some years, the gamekeeper management which brought the positive outcomes could not be afforded in the long run, the report said.
READ MORE: Greens want to reforest Scotland's grouse moors
The partnership included Buccleuch, Scottish Natural Heritage, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds Scotland and Natural England.
Mark Oddy speaking for the project hosts Buccleuch said: “Buccleuch was proud to be part of this important project.
“As an estate business with sporting interests, it was heartening to see the environmental and conservation benefits of moorland management highlighted.
“Clearly, many challenges lie ahead in ensuring these benefits can continue but this report underlines the fact that moorland management has a positive and substantial contribution to make in preserving our cherished moorland for the future."
READ MORE: Scotland’s wildlife in crisis as species set ‘to vanish’
Ross Johnston, of SNH said: “This report is being published at a critical time, with the climate emergency and biodiversity loss high on the agenda.
“The report shows the strength of partnership working in tackling key wildlife management issues.
“The project delivered some recovery of wader bird populations, supported important rural jobs, allowed many visitors to enjoy seeing hen harriers and other raptors in an attractive setting and has produced many important scientific publications.
“We also now know that driven grouse moor management is difficult in the face of rising predation pressure - much of it due to historical land use changes such as habitat loss and, at Langholm, neighbouring forestry harbouring predators.”
Teresa Dent, chief executive of the Game and Wildlife Conservation said: “The partnership working on this moor has delivered profound and practical insight into what it takes to sustain our moorlands.
"We all hoped that reaching a moorland balance would be easy and some seemed to think it would be. It was not, especially within the current policy framework which needs to adapt to new habitat and predation circumstances if we wish to keep our moors.
"The project has demonstrated that where numbers of red grouse have fallen to low levels perhaps because habitat management has reduced or has been abandoned, or predators are no longer controlled by gamekeepers, it is exceptionally difficult to recover that moor to a state where driven grouse shooting can take place.
"Without driven shooting we know active management declines, exposing ground nesting birds of prey to predation themselves, and losing heather cover.
“The clear message from this final report is not one of a binary choice of red grouse or birds of prey, but that we need both to be balanced if we value our moorlands and their ecosystems.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel