SITTING in on the first board meeting at NHS Lothian since the opening of the new children's hospital was shelved, I was struck by the unanimous agreement in the room that investigations into what went wrong must not be a 'blame game'.
On the one hand, it might seem fair and reasonable to want to 'learn lessons' to avoid this sort of fiasco in future.
I'm sure the staff, patients and their families left in limbo would not want others to endure the same stress and disappointment.
But here's the thing.
READ MORE: Sick Kids' hospital delay 'should not be about blame', says finance director
These sort of fiascos do keep happening on major projects. Remember the Edinburgh trams, the Scottish Parliament building, or more recently Dumfries' £28 million school, North West Community Campus, which had to close for nine months' worth of repairs less than a month after it opened?
It is not unique to Scotland, of course - think HS2 or the Millennium Dome - and it's certainly not unique to any particular political party being in power.
But regardless of who's in charge, it's taxpayers who end up footing the bill for someone else's incompetence.
So maybe pleas to 'learn lessons' are wearing thin, particularly as the lessons don't seem to be working.
I can't help but wonder if it is precisely this lack of blame, of anyone responsible ever truly being held to account and made to pay - literally or metaphorically - that is part of the problem.
It is all very well calling for the scalp of the Health Secretary du jour, but what exactly is the point - other than scoring pointless party political points?
Yes, the SNP has been the party of Government for the duration of the project but there have been four different Health Secretaries. How would Jeane Freeman resigning now actually help the situation?
READ MORE: Clinicians 'pressured' to sign off on flawed hospital design
If voters believe the SNP have done a shoddy job of running the show, let the voters oust them.
But simply changing the shade of politicians in charge doesn't seem to do much to prevent these fiascos.
There also seems to be a double-standard for blame in the NHS. Just look at the Dr Bawa-Garba case in England where a junior doctor was left to carry the can when understaffing and IT problems contributed to a boy's death.
The current system for major projects is too opaque and too open to buck-passing.
Private consortia hire contractors, who delegate work to sub-contractors who sub-contract again and, if things go awry, there are so many legal loopholes that it's cheaper to make the taxpayer pay to fix them than to sue.
How is that right?
READ MORE: NHS Lothian paid £11.6m after warnings it was 'too risky' to sue consortium
And all the while we pay our NHS executives to oversee delivery and the non-executive directors to scrutinise them on our behalf.
Someone, or many, haven't done the jobs they should.
I think it's only fair to ask where blame lies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel