¬¬WOOD has been rated a top oil services sector pick by a City analyst who noted the Scots engineering giant has relatively limited exposure to the upstream exploration and production business.
Nick Green, senior oil and gas analyst at Bernstein, sees potential for a dramatic increase in the valuation of Aberdeen-based Wood, which he said was lean and well run.
Read more: Wood shares surge as Scots engineering giant achieves strong growth in profits
“We continue to believe its idiosyncratic growth story is robust, and fully underpins the dividend,” wrote Mr Green in a research note.
This highlights the benefits Wood enjoys after diversifying amid the downturn in the oil services market in areas such as the North Sea that was triggered by the crude price plunge from 2014.
“Wood has the least ‘upstream O&G’ exposure of all our names, and accesses multiple industrial end markets,” wrote Mr Green. “None are spectacular; most are robust.”
Mr Green reckons Wood’s earnings could enjoy a significant boost as a result of the £2.2 billion acquisition of Amec Foster Wheeler (AFW) in 2017.
Read more: Wood says oil and gas market recovery slower than expected
Master-minded by Wood’s chief executive Robin Watson, the deal gave the group exposure to a wider range of markets, including nuclear engineering.
Mr Green thinks Wood overpaid for AFW but could achieve big cost savings in the operations acquired.
He also thinks Wood’s share price may have been depressed as a result of short selling by people based on expectations of a cut in the company’s dividend, which he appears to believe are unjustified.
Bernstein’s target price for Wood shares is 830p. They closed up 25.3p at 514.2p yesterday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here