BRITAIN'S accounting watchdog has slammed major firms over substandard audits, with a quarter judged to be below the acceptable standard.
In its latest annual inspection the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) said there had been no improvement on last year and criticised all seven of the UK's biggest auditors for failing to challenge company bosses.
Three quarters of FTSE 350 audits were judged to be good or requiring limited improvements, below the FRC target of 90%.
Grant Thornton was singled out for tougher scrutiny after the firm's rate of acceptable audits dropped to 50 per cent, compared with 75% last year.
PwC also exhibited a deterioration in its FTSE 350 accounts, from 84% to 65%. The firm has pledged to invest in people, training and technology to get its auditing quality back up to standard.
KPMG, which was heavily criticised in last year's report, was found to have acceptable audits in 80% of FTSE 350 accounts versus just 50% last year.
But the firm, which audited the accounts of collapsed outsourcer Carillion, remains under enhanced scrutiny.
Stephen Haddrill, chief executive of the FRC, said: "At a time when the future of the audit sector is under the microscope, the latest audit quality results are not acceptable. Audit firms must identify the causes of their audit shortcomings and take rapid and appropriate action to improve quality."
The FRC said cases were found across all seven firms where auditors had not sufficiently challenged management, due to an "absence of professional scepticism" as well as tight deadlines and familiarity with long-standing partners.
It comes at a time of heightened pressure on auditors, following high-profile cases such as the collapse of Patisserie Valerie, which was audited by Grant Thornton when a black hole was discovered in its accounts.
The FRC said it would set a new target for the accounts inspected for 2020-2021, aiming for 100% of audits to require no more than limited improvement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here