FIRSTGROUP has launched a stinging attack on the US activist investor campaigning for the removal of its chairman and chief executive, branding its plans “inconsistent” and “irresponsible”.
Coast Capital, the biggest shareholder in FirstGroup with a near 10-per cent stake, has mounted a public attack on the performance of the transport giant, claiming its current board has presided over a “track record of value destruction and under-performance”. It wants to remove six of the company’s eleven directors, including chief executive Matthew Gregory and chairman Wolfhart Hauser, and replace them with seven of its nominees.
Mr Gregory unveiled a new strategy for the group last week, which could see it exit First Bus and scale back its rail franchising activity in the UK, while putting its Greyhound coach operation in the US up for sale. That would leave it to focus on First Student and First Transit across the Atlantic.
Now it has turned its fire on “self-styled” activist investor Coast Capital, which wants FirstGroup to exit UK rail. Confirming a general meeting will be held in London on June 25, when investors will vote on the Coast resolutions, FirstGroup said: “Based on its many interactions with Coast Capital to date and its claims and proposals, the board believes that Coast Capital is an opportunistic, self-interested player that is only focused on short-term gains.”
FirstGroup called on shareholders to vote against Coast’s proposals.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here