WHEN Education Secretary John Swinney says there is more choice in Scottish schools now than ever before he is probably correct.
The current range of extra-curricular activities, vocational opportunities and courses devoted to practical skills has never been greater.
READ MORE: Academics say school subject squeeze is hitting deprived
And this was as the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) stipulated with the underlying rationale in 2004 the creation of more space for pupils to develop the literacy, numeracy and other essential skills required for their future life and work.
CfE also demanded more space for sport, music, dance, drama, art, learning about health, sustainable development and enterprise.
But, as academics from Stirling University have pointed out in new research highlighted in The Herald today, there is also a squeezing of choice in schools.
The restructuring of the curriculum to give pupils a broader experience in the first three years of secondary has meant that in many schools the number of formal qualifications being sat in fourth year is reducing.
That essentially means fewer subjects can be timetabled in S4 when pupils get around to sitting the National 5s that replaced Standard Grades.
Concerns with this are twofold. The squeeze means some subjects are disproportionately affected, including some sciences, modern languages and social subjects.
The other issue, highlighted in the Stirling University report, is the fact the squeeze appears to be impacting on schools in some of the most disadvantaged areas of Scotland.
READ MORE: Disadvantaged pupils hit by subject squeeze
One answer to this from minsters is that CfE offers flexibility to pick up qualifications at a later stage and that the success of the school system should not be judged in S4 alone.
However, the Stirling University report is not so convinced, concluding: “Very few schools have taken advantage of this flexibility. Therefore, curriculum narrowing in S4 may have significant effects on future enrolment and transitions by narrowing choice.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here