NORTH Sea-focused EnQuest has seen its shares fall 12 per cent after it said production from a big field off Shetland is set to remain well below initial expectations.
EnQuest generated excitement in the oil and gas industry when it started up the Kraken heavy oil field East of Shetland with Cairn Energy in 2017 only for the partners to face production challenges.
Read more: EnQuest shares plunge as storms hold back Kraken
While Kraken was expected to produce 50,000 barrels per day at peak when it was brought onstream, output last year averaged 30,300 bopd.
EnQuest said yesterday that output has risen materially in recent months following an increase in production efficiency.
But the company left its guidance that full year production from Kraken would average 30,000 bopd to 35,000 bopd unchanged.
The update came weeks after Cairn cut its valuation of Kraken by $166 million.
Noting last week that Kraken had suffered production equipment issues, Cairn boss Simon Thomson said the experience had not put the firm off investing in North Sea projects.
Read more: Scots oil and gas star sees potential in North Sea amid challenges off Shetland
EnQuest has maintained its valuation of Kraken signalling confidence in the field’s long term performance.
It has been pleased with the performance of other North Sea fields, after expanding amid the challenges posed by the plunge in oil prices from 2014.
Chief executive Amjad Bseisu said EnQuest remains confident of achieving its 2019 production guidance of 63,000 to 70,000 barrels oil equivalent per day.
Read more: North Sea is 'attractive investment proposition' says oil firm
Describing the oil price environment as favourable, he said EnQuest is on track to reduce debt as expected this year.
EnQuest shares closed down 2.8p at 20.1p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here