THE AMERICAN owner of supermarket giant Asda is “seriously considering” listing the business on the stock exchange in the wake of its planned merger with rival Sainsbury’s being blocked by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) last month.
Walmart, which has owned Asda since 1999, and Sainsbury's were told by the competition watchdog that the proposed combination of two of the UK’s biggest retail names would have led to a “substantial lessening of competition” in the market with the end result being that shoppers and motorists would be left “worse off”.
In an address given to over 1,200 UK managers this week, Walmart International chief executive Judith McKenna said the company was now looking into a stock market flotation as a means of securing Asda’s long-term success.
READ MORE: Competition watchdog blocks Sainsbury’s-Asda merger
“Walmart does not have a one size fits all approach to operating its international markets, but a consistent focus on strong local businesses powered by Walmart,” she said.
“While we are not rushing into anything, I want you to know that we are seriously considering a path to an IPO – a public listing – to strengthen your long-term success.”
While Ms McKenna conceded that it would “take years” to get the business ready for a public offering, Asda chief executive Roger Burnley said the company would take a number of other steps to sustain the business following the collapse of the Sainsbury’s deal.
Noting that as a key part of Asda’s strategy is to “win on price”, Mr Burnley said the business would be investing £80 million over the course of this year to “accelerate our price position” in areas that are most important to customers.
READ MORE: Asda-Sainsbury’s deal hit by findings of regulatory probe
Adding that as “ease is almost as important as price” to customers, Mr Burnley said that Asda also planned to start trialling new technology and same-day deliveries on groceries to ensure a “hassle-free” shopping experience.
“Forget the language of Plan A and Plan B,” Mr Burnley said. “There has always been one clear strategy for Asda [and that] requires momentum in the short term, growth in the medium term and sustainability in the long term.
“We need to prioritise and focus on what will make a difference to customers versus what won’t.”
Despite Ms McKenna saying that Asda has become “a stronger business over the last year” and that Walmart would ensure it had the resources to achieve “even greater things”, the GMB union has raised concerns about what the mooted plans mean for Asda’s 60,000 UK staff.
“We have called for an urgent meeting with Walmart bosses,” said GMB national officer Gary Carter. “GMB’s tens of thousands of Asda members have had enough uncertainty – they need to know that their futures are safe and secure.
“Walmart needs to remember they are playing with people’s lives while they try to make billions on the stock market.”
Asda and Sainsbury’s first revealed their intention to join forces in a £12 billion merger last April, with the CMA launching a formal investigation into the proposal in August.
READ MORE: Sainsbury's and Asda reveal details of £12 billion merger
The competition watchdog indicated in February that the merger was unlikely to succeed, with a preliminary report noting that if it went ahead the deal would lead to “higher prices, a poorer shopping experience, and reductions in the range and quality of products offered”.
The supermarkets rejected those findings, saying that they “fundamentally misunderstand how people shop in the UK today”.
The deal was rejected in April, however, with CMA inquiry group chair Stuart McIntosh saying the inquiry had “concluded that there is no effective way of addressing our concerns, other than to block the merger”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here