A bank is being warned it could face a raft of equal pay claims after a £150,000 payout in a long-running case of a woman who complained of being paid less than a man for doing the same job.
Unite said the former female employee of the Royal Bank of Scotland was paid over £30,000 a year less in pay and benefits than a male counterpart doing the same job over seven years.
She was made redundant in 2017 and was about to take a claim to an employment tribunal when the case was settled, said Unite.
Unite national officer Rob MacGregor said: “This really is a shocking case of unequal pay and undermines the credibility of the employer's supposed 'fair' pay philosophy. It also points to something very wrong within the bank and there is an urgent need for RBS to get its house in order."
Unite assistant general secretary for legal services Howard Beckett said: “We now know that the number of women who received a bonus in 2015 was 20 per cent compared to 39% of men and that a year later the gap widened further still. Unite will be reviewing the implications of this case and won’t hesitate to support further equal pay claims.”
"Unite will be reviewing the implications of this case and won't hesitate to support further equal pay claims."
A bank spokesman said: "We take a fair and inclusive approach to setting pay and career progression and do not pay our colleagues differently for doing the same job because of their gender.
"In this particular case, although we don't agree that any difference in pay was due to gender, we don't think we got things right in certain areas and therefore have agreed a settlement to resolve the matter."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here