THE owners of two Scottish plumbing firms have spoken about the devastating effect membership of an industry-wide pension scheme has had on their businesses, noting that they have been rendered worthless due to an unintended consequence of legislation designed to protect pensioners.
Under rules brought in in 2005, businesses that are sold or wound up are required to pay one-off sums into their employees’ defined benefit pension to ensure it has enough money to pay their full future entitlement.
Due to a loophole in the legislation these so-called Section 75 payments are continually triggered in multi-employer schemes such as the Plumbing & Mechanical Services (UK) Industry Pension Scheme - better known as Plumbing Pensions - with anything from a change in ownership structure to no longer having an employee paying into the scheme making individual employers liable.
READ MORE: Plumbers asked to pay potentially ruinous pension debts
The sums do not represent money that has been withheld from the scheme, but rather, in the case of Plumbing Pensions, a proportion of the amount of money the fully funded £2 billion scheme thinks it may need to ensure it can pay the full pensions of its 35,000 members.
Plumbing Pensions has not collected any Section 75 payments in the 14 years since the legislation changed, but is now seeking to do so and is in the process of writing to 100 Scottish firms with the aim of collecting sums that could be as high as several million pounds.
The owner of one north-east plumbing firm, which pays employer contributions of around £40,000 into the scheme each year, said that despite taking action to ensure his business is not immediately hit with a Section 75 demand, in reality the problem has just been “kicked down the road”.
Having initially joined the firm his father started, the business owner said a Section 75 payment was triggered when the company converted in a “seamless transaction” from a partnership to a limited company in 2006.
Though the scheme did not inform him of this, he was told in 2014 that the sum due at that time would have been in the region of £850,000.
Having taken out a flexible apportionment arrangement, he will not have to make a Section 75 payment as long as he and his wife continue to own the business, but a new owner will, making it impossible for him to sell the firm or pass it on to his children.
“No one in their right minds would take on a pension liability like this and if I wound it up it would immediately trigger a debt that would be several million pounds,” he said. “It’s untenable - 34 years of hard work in the business are worthless.”
The owner of a firm based in Perth, meanwhile, said that because a Section 75 payment would become due if she sought to pass on, sell or wind up her family’s “small limited company”, her business too “has become worthless”.
READ MORE: Plumbers group hits out at handling of potentially ruinous pension fund debts
She also noted that those employers still associated with the pension are being unduly impacted by the scheme’s earlier decision not to collect any debts when they were triggered.
“As it’s a last man standing scheme, millions of pounds of orphan liabilities from companies which have gone bust or folded over the last 10-plus years are falling to us remaining companies in the scheme,” she said.
Plumbing Pensions chief executive Kate Yates said previously that the scheme did not seek to collect Section 75 payments in the past because it thought it would be disproprotionately expensive to do so. The scheme was also involved in lobbying government for a change to the legislation in relation to multi-employer pensions.
After The Pensions Regulator said in 2014 that neither a change to the law nor a special exemption for the plumbers’ scheme was likely, Plumbing Pensions began the process of gathering the data required to calculate how much individual employers owed.
Currently 350 businesses contribute to the scheme - 160 of which are based in Scotland – although around 4,000 have used it since it launched in the 1970s.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here