MANAGERS of small and medium sized businesses are more pessimistic about the impact of Brexit than their larger counterparts, with smaller businesses also claiming to be less prepared for the UK’s impending departure from the European Union.
According to a survey of 250 Scottish businesses carried out by law firm Anderson Strathern, 57 per cent of SMEs believe Brexit will be negative for their company while just 41% of senior managers at larger corporates do.
Despite this, just 56% of SMEs said they were prepared for the eventuality of a no-deal Brexit while 68% of large businesses are.
Anderson Strathern director Neil Amner said the figures were worrying in relation to smaller firms, particularly as 26% of managers in that grouping said they had not yet started assessing what the risk to their business would be.
Overall, the inability to hire staff from the EU was of major concern to survey participants, with 35% of all respondents saying they rely heavily on being able to recruit EU nationals and 54% saying they felt they would encounter difficulties in attracting staff from the EU. Glasgow-based businesses said they are more reliant on the EU as a key market than Edinburgh-based companies, at 59% against 48%.
Despite the overall pessimism, the majority of larger firms said they felt optimistic about future growth, with 68% saying that in the long term Brexit would likely create new opportunities, particularly in markets such as China and the US.
“Over time we get to a point, around five years after the UK leaves the EU, whether on a negotiated or a no-deal basis, by which there is almost a 50-50 call about whether Brexit is for the better or not,” Mr Amner said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here