Marks & Spencer has confirmed it is in talks with Ocado over the possible creation of a joint venture, following weeks of speculation.
The retailer said there was no certainty that the discussions would result in an agreement, and there was no guaranteed timescale.
However, shares in Ocado soared higher on the news, jumping as much as 12.5% before lunchtime.
M&S shares were also higher, climbing around 4%.
It comes after a report in the Evening Standard suggested that the tie-up could be announced as soon as Wednesday, with M&S paying up to £900 million for a 50% stake in the venture which would give it a food delivery service for the first time.
Ocado's existing contract with Waitrose, which is coming up for renewal, has added time pressure to the negotiations. The company will need to trigger an 18-month break clause with the supermarket by the end of this week in order to walk away from its longstanding partner.
The potential deal with M&S was first reported in late January, prompting a rise in Ocado's share which was later wiped out when a fire broke out at its Andover warehouse, denting its sales expectations.
Reacting to confirmation that the companies are in talks, Bernstein analyst Bruno Monteyne said the joint venture structure would be beneficial for Ocado, which still uses its retail business to demonstrate the capabilities of its technology.
He added that M&S could be a useful partner for the launch of Ocado Zoom, a one-hour delivery service.
"Ocado Zoom could be a major growth path for Ocado," he said. "We believe the food of M&S (ready meals, quality food) is perfectly suited for this more upmarket convenience shopping. M&S would boost the potential of Zoom in the UK."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here