Sainsbury's and Asda would probably need to sell off a significant number of stores and potentially one of the two brands to address "extensive" concerns over their planned tie-up, the competition watchdog has warned.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it would be "difficult for the companies to address the concerns it has identified" so far in its probe into the deal.
READ MORE: Sainsbury’s and Asda in talks over £10bn merger
In provisional findings from its Phase 2 investigation, it said the merger could push up prices and reduce quality in store and online, while it could also lead to higher fuel costs at more than 100 locations where Sainsbury's and Asda petrol stations overlap.
The CMA said options to address concerns could include blocking the deal altogether, or forcing the chains to sell off a "significant" number of stores and potentially offloading either the Sainsbury's or Asda brand.
Stuart McIntosh, chairman of the independent inquiry group carrying out the CMA investigation, said: "These are two of the biggest supermarkets in the UK, with millions of people purchasing their products and services every day.
"We have provisionally found that, should the two merge, shoppers could face higher prices, reduced quality and choice, and a poorer overall shopping experience across the UK."
READ MORE: Margaret Taylor: ASDA might be fighting on, but its equal-pay case looks unwinnable
A spokesman for Sainsbury's and Asda said the provisional findings "misunderstand how people shop in the UK today".
"The CMA has moved the goalposts and its analysis is inconsistent with comparable cases," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article