EXPLORATION is back on the agenda in the North Sea with the West of Shetland area generating huge interest in the oil and gas industry according to experts who reckon the recovery in UK waters will continue this year.
Read more: Shetland discovery provides boost for oil and gas industry
Wood Mackenzie noted drilling activity on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf is set to increase markedly this year after hitting record lows following the crude price plunge that took a heavy toll on the industry.
Declaring “exploration is back in the UK,” the oil and gas consultancy said as many as 15 wells could be drilled in the UK North Sea this year, compared with just eight in 2018.
“Siccar Point’s Blackrock and Lyon wells West of Shetland are the ones to watch. Both are high risk but have standalone potential,” added Edinburgh-based Wood Mackenzie.
The comments highlight the surging interest in the relatively under-explored West of Shetland area. This has been encouraged by the partial recovery in the crude price from late 2016.
The success enjoyed by the pioneering Hurricane Energy West of Shetland has also emboldened firms to risk big sums drilling in an area they may feel offers greater potential than parts of the UKCS that have seen more activity.
The Lancaster field discovered by Hurricane Energy is due to come onstream soon. The field is expected to help power a four per cent increase in UK North Sea output, which more than halved between 2000 and 2014.
Read more: Oil and gas independents punching above weight in North Sea
Wood Mackenzie noted seven UK fields are expected to start up this year including the giant Mariner development East of Shetland and the Culzean field off Aberdeen.
Analysts at the firm reckon increased confidence among oil and gas firms will encourage them to take Final Investment Decisions (FIDs) to approve a range of other new developments.
“This year will see the North Sea recovery consolidate,” said Wood Mackenzie, adding: “We expect another bumper year for North Sea FIDs.”
Wood Mackenzie said 12 UK North Sea project approvals are “in sight”, with $7bn investment in prospect this year.
Some 13 UK North Sea projects won approval last year. This was more than were approved in total in the three preceding years, during which firms slashed investment in the North Sea in response to the oil price fall.
Read more: BP expects production at giant Shetland oil field 'to last for decades'
Wood Mackenzie noted majors such as BP and Shell are investing in their slimmed down portfolios. New players who bought North Sea assets in the belief the downturn created opportunities are also stoking investment.
The cost of North Sea assets and services such as drilling support fell during the downturn, posing huge challenges for firms in the supply chain.
Wood Mackenzie said there is a pool of potential buyers that are eager to grow in the North Sea.
Private equity firms have made billions available to support ambitious expansion programmes launched by the likes of Siccar Point, Chrysaor and Neptune Energy.
US majors Chevron and ConocoPhillips are cutting exposure to the North Sea to free up funds to invest in areas such as the shale fields of Texas.
The bullish forecast from Wood Mackenzie will probably be welcomed by firms in the North Sea supply chain, which remains under pressure. It was accompanied by the prediction that costs will begin to creep up.
However, Wood Mackenzie cautioned: “Against the backdrop of Brexit and the genuine possibility of a global recession, there could be uncertainty ahead.” It said companies with the lowest-cost projects and most options will be the winners this year.
The crude price has fallen from a four-year high of $85 per barrel in October to around $58/bbl, with booming production in the US offsetting output curbs agreed by Opec members to support the market. Brent crude fell from $115/bbl in June 2014 to less than $30/bbl early in 2016.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel