THE new chief executive of Bowleven, Eli Chahin, has defended the decision to move its headquarters from Edinburgh to London claiming costs had run ahead of the progress achieved in the field under the old management team.
Mr Chahin said the shake up completed at the oil and gas firm had put Bowleven in position to maximise the potential of its most promising asset in a way that could help generate value for investors.
“There’s been quite a lot of value destruction over the last few years, there were quite a few disgruntled shareholders,” said Mr Chahin who took charge in March last year following a campaign for change led by the Crown Ocean Capital investment operation. This resulted in former chief executive Kevin Hart being voted off the board along with four other directors.
In January last year Crown Ocean accused Bowleven of significant shareholder value destruction. It said Bowleven had used more than $500 million cash, and paid around $44m remuneration to directors, in the preceding 10 years only to see its share price plunge 90 per cent.
Cameroon-focused Bowleven cut around 30 jobs after last year’s boardroom upheaval .
“It’s unfortunate that you had to go through the restructuring you did but the reality was in the absence of that shareholders would not have been given the chance to recoup their value,” said Mr Chahin.
He said: “I think one of the issues with this company historically was that the G and A (general and administrative cost) was so disconnected from the progress on the top line and I think we’ve got a right-sized organisation.”
Mr Chahin said G and A costs had totalled around $12m annually before he took charge. In March Bowleven said they were running at $0.35m monthly.
The company has been able to reduce its annual accommodation costs from around £400,000 to £35,000 following the move from Edinburgh to London, where it can maintain close contact with partners.
Noting that Bowleven now has six employees, Mr Chahin said the company could operate with a smaller staff after deciding to focus its resources on the Etinde permit offshore.
Bowleven investigated possible mergers and acquisitions under past management and conducted early stage exploration work in as Kenya as well as drilling in Cameroon.
It was offered acquisition opportunities after selling stakes in the Etinde permit in a $250 million deal clinched by Mr Hart in 2014.
The company had around $83m cash at the end of the first half on December 31.
Speaking ahead of the publication of its annual results today, Mr Chahin underlined his confidence that the decision to focus resources on Etinde would pay off.
Noting finds made on the company’s acreage are estimated to contain around a trillion cubic feet of gas he said: “It’s inconceivable that a reserve of this size can not be monetised at such a level that shareholders who have come in over the last two or three years can’t get back the money they have invested.”
Mr Chahin said the fall in the share price following the publication of the results of recent appraisal drilling probably reflected disappointment that the wells did not discover enough additional gas to support a floating liquefied natural gas development.
However, partners in Etinde are assessing a range of options. Mr Chahin hopes they will complete the work in time to make a Final Investment Decision next year on whether to develop the field.
After leaving Bowleven, Mr Hart defended the performance of the company in his 10 years in charge, noting it found a lot of oil and gas off Cameroon but was frustrated by geopolitical factors.
Bowleven shares closed at 25.9p yesterday. They closed at 33.25p on the day Mr Hart lost his place on the board.
The company raised £39m at 327p per share in 2008.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel