IT has been interesting to observe the increasing willingness of Ross McEwan to comment on matters beyond the fortunes of Royal Bank of Scotland.
In recent weeks we have seen Mr McEwan put his head above the parapet to warn a no-deal Brexit could push the UK economy into recession. Now we know the bank is worried about the Brexit process, with the uncertainty around the end-game forcing it to make a £100 million charge in its accounts.
From a UK economy perspective, it is surely a worry that one of the country’s biggest providers of business and personal finance has factored into its accounts an expectation of greater risk to the downside from Brexit. It certainly concerned investors, who sent the bank’s share price tumbling more than four per cent yesterday.
Beyond the economics, the bank’s Brexit positioning was interesting politically too. Political comment from the bank has been scarce since it was bailed out by the UK Government a decade ago. And this is understandable, of course: it would be a very odd state of affairs for a management team to take its majority shareholder to task. But there are signs the tide is beginning to turn. With Royal profitable, paying dividends, and the Government reducing its stake, could we be about to see Mr McEwan stepping into public debate even more?
Ultimately, his objective is to maximise value for shareholders. But with Brexit looking increasingly like an obstacle to making that happen, it could put him on a collision course with the organisation that saved the bank from extinction.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel