Sainsbury's is understood to have considered a shock takeover of struggling high street retailer Mothercare, it can be revealed.
The supermarket giant's deals team studied a potential move for the babywear chain in recent months but stopped short of tabling an offer, people familiar with the matter told the Press Association.
Mothercare shares rocketed 17% to 20.5p on Thursday following news of the interest.
Sainsbury's chief executive Mike Coupe has been in acquisitive mood since taking the helm in 2014, having snapped up Argos for £1.4 billion in 2016 and then ultimately deciding against pressing ahead with a takeover of wholesaler Nisa last year.
Sainsbury's has also recently expanded the availability of its Tu clothing range, which includes babywear.
The clothing arm contributes almost £1 billion in annual sales to the grocery group and the addition of Mothercare would have seen the division beefed up considerably.
Mothercare's stock market value is around £30 million and the news comes at a difficult time for the firm.
The group has been hammered on the stock market after warning over profits twice since the start of the year and revealing that crisis talks with its banks were under way.
Mothercare recently appointed KPMG as an adviser, with the accountancy giant drafted in to help it secure covenant waivers as it looks at additional sources of financing from its lenders HSBC and Barclays.
On Wednesday it parted company with its chief executive Mark Newton-Jones, replacing him with former Kmart and Tesco man David Wood.
Retailers across the board have been battered by weak consumer confidence off the back of soaring Brexit-fuelled inflation.
They have also had to contend with surging wage costs and eye-watering business rate hikes.
Since January, Toys R Us and Maplin have filed for administration, while fashion retailers such as New Look and Select have embarked on radical store closure programmes.
Sainsbury's and Mothercare declined to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here