LIZ CAMERON
Scottish Chambers of Commerce was grateful to be included in a “business roundtable” with Finance Secretary Derek Mackay last week, along with other business groups and representatives of civic Scotland.
On behalf of the Chambers Network we were given the opportunity to comment on Mr Mackay’s recent paper “The Role of Income Tax in Scotland’s Budget”, intended as fuel for “a debate about how we finance our public services and grow our economy”.
The paper puts forward various scenarios postulating the likely impact on society and the economy if, as Mr Mackay writes in the introduction, the Scottish Government chooses to “use our limited tax powers differently”.
There is now very little doubt that this phrase is a euphemism for proposed higher income taxes in Scotland, a prospect that has support amongst other Holyrood parties, though probably less so amongst the electorate.
Like the First Minister herself, when she launched the paper on 2 November, the finance secretary has been careful to soften the expected blow of tax rises by stressing the extra social value that Scottish taxpayers receive from various universal benefits and exemptions.
Much of the tax debate so far has revolved around the likely “behavioural response” to possible increases. By this is meant the unknowable reaction of individuals, especially wealthy ones, to higher tax demands, and their ability to avoid handing over what tax policy-makers expect them to hand over.
The Scottish Chambers of Commerce has long warned of “behavioural” side effects from higher tax demands especially where the behaviour of prospective investors is concerned. We believe that any changes to income tax in Scotland must be compatible with the need to create a competitive environment in Scotland that attracts and retains talent. A document that seems primarily designed to soften potential opposition to a more highly-taxed Scotland sends all the wrong messages to the right people, taking Scotland in exactly the wrong direction.
Whatever is announced, the forthcoming Scottish Budget must not be seen as a deterrent to those wishing to grow companies and to prosper personally in this devolved tax environment. Scotland’s relatively lacklustre growth rate illustrates the need to attract and retain more entrepreneurs and good quality employers. An offer to would-be investors that they will pay more in income tax than elsewhere in the UK to enjoy our “distinct social contract” is perhaps not much of an incentive to invest. Equally, we must take into consideration the already squeezed household incomes and the impact any potential reductions on take-home pay might have on Scotland's economy.
The Scottish Government’s tax paper seems to take as read that higher spending by Government automatically equates to better results, including improvements in the business environment. In a landmark document about the use of new tax powers, potential investors in Scotland will not be encouraged by the document’s lack of acknowledgement of the existence of fiscal constraints on spending, and the importance of reducing the future debt burden, to balance the usual point-scoring about austerity.
From a business perspective, clear assurances will be required from politicians that any additional revenue raised would be earmarked for policies that measurably boost Scotland's economic growth on which all social spending depends.
Liz Cameron is chief executive of Scottish Chambers of Commerce.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel