THE UK should set its sights on securing a Brexit deal which delivers more than the recently-secured CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) struck between Canada and the European Union (EU).
The call comes from ICAS (Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland), which commissioned a report from Canadian experts who were close to the CETA talks to establish whether that deal could provide a blueprint for the Brexit negotiations. It follows comments from top EU negotiator Michel Barnier, who recently warned that the UK should expect little better from its divorce from the EU than CETA, while noting that it will take years to negotiate a deal.
Bruce Cartwright, executive director for policy at ICAS, said: “Our independent report evidences that while CETA is a good baseline, it doesn’t go nearly far enough to represent the right deal for British business.
“In particular, it comes up short on services, which make up a substantial and valuable part of the UK economy.
“The British negotiating team needs to learn from the Canada experience and deliver a deal which goes considerably beyond CETA.
“We also believe that the evidence laid out in this ICAS commissioned report could be crucial in reducing the length of time it takes to strike a deal by providing pointers to where agreed elements of CETA could be lifted and applied to Brexit.”
Among the shortcomings highlighted by the CETA, Brexit and Beyond report include the fact that Canada still does not have a ratified deal on financial services, with the agreement only providing temporary entry for professional services into Europe. The report also highlights the importance of “negative lists”, which mean that “everything is in unless it is specifically agreed as out”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here