A CONUNDRUM many small businesses face is how to fund the expansion of their operations without access to financial backing.
At one time a sound business plan and a solid track record would have been enough to secure a bank package, but the ongoing conservatism show towards small business owners means nothing short of an already-thriving turnover will convince most banks to advance any significant sums of cash.
The irony – and frustration - of the situation will not be lost on those that are seeking the cash in order to generate the turnover in the first place.
Which is why the model adopted by private bank Weatherbys is throwing a lifeline to the likes of Niall Macalister Hall, who despite owning significant assets in the shape of Torrisdale Castle Estate and having the pledge of a 20-year income stream from a planned hydro-electric scheme was refused a £500,000 funding package from his previous bank.
Where the other bank had measured Mr Macalister Hall’s ability to pay based on his income at the time of applying, Weatherbys took a longer term view, factoring in the income the scheme was going to make as well as the assets that backed it.
Two years on and the decision is paying off, with the hydro scheme funding a new gin brand that is winning awards and smashing targets just months into production.
From Skyscanner to Appointedd, BrewDog to Mallzee, Scotland is a hotbed for entrepreneurial excellence. Surely it’s time more banks took a less punishing stance and started helping more of them get off the ground.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here