Scotland's Chief Statistician published three reports on Tuesday in relation to pesticide usage in Scotland in 2016 on arable crops and potato stores, soft fruit crops and the use of rodenticides on arable farms.
Ninety-eight per cent of arable crops in Scotland were treated with pesticides in 2016 with a total combined application weight of 1,490 tonnes. Fungicides were the most frequently used pesticides on arable crops, followed by herbicides and insecticides. Overall pesticide application was very similar to that reported in the previous survey in 2014.
For the first time information was collated about grower adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) measures in relation to risk management, pest monitoring and pest control. In relation to pesticide use on stored potatoes, 47 per cent of seed potatoes and 11 per cent of ware potatoes were treated with a pesticide in 2016. Again, these proportions are the same as reported in 2014.
Ninety-four per cent of soft fruit crops in Scotland were treated with pesticides, with a total combined weight of 14.7 tonnes. Insecticides/acaricides and fungicides were the main pesticide types encountered. Overall pesticide application was 32 per cent lower in 2016 than reported in 2014. Growers were using a variety of IPM methods in relation to risk management, pest monitoring and pest control. Almost all of the growers, 96 per cent of the sample, used non-chemical control in partnership, or instead of, chemical control.
It was estimated that rodenticides were used on 78 per cent of arable farms in 2016. Approximately 91 tonnes of rodenticide bait, containing less than 5kg of active substance, was estimated to have been used. This was 19 per cent lower than in the previous survey in 2014. The rodenticides encountered were almost exclusively second-generation anticoagulant compounds.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here