THE boss of Irn-Bru maker AG Barr has declared consumer tastes, not government regulation, will determine how the business is run as he repeated the company’s criticism of moves to introduce a soft drinks levy.
Roger White was commenting as the Cumbernauld-based soft-drinks giant shrugged off “volatile and uncertain market conditions” to post a 2.7 per cent rise in underlying pre-tax profits to £42.4 million.
Ahead of the expected introduction by the UK Government next year of a sugar tax on soft drinks, the Scottish firm confirmed 90 per cent of its company-owned brands will contain less than 5g of total sugars per 100ml by the autumn.
Chancellor Philip Hammond declared in his Budget speech earlier this month the steps taken by soft-drinks producers to reformulate their products before the levy is introduced had resulted in a “lower revenue forecast for this tax”. But Mr White insisted it is down to consumers to lead the type of products AG Barr develops, not regulators.
He said: “We said at the time [the levy was announced that] we will drive our business based on consumer, rather than on legislators. That’s what we have done.
“We have followed what is going on with the consumer, we have talked increasingly to consumers about what is important to them. And the changes we have made, while not unhelpful from a regulatory point of view, are driven by consumers rather than anything else.”
Mr White noted AG Barr had already been reshaping its portfolio in the last five to 10 years before the sugar tax came into view, citing its acquisition of the Strathmore Water and Rubicon brands, as well its reformulation exiting drinks. He added: “At the end of the day, we are a consumer business and it’s our consumers who should drive our business and nobody else.”
Mr White said the company continues to have regular dialogue with Government officials in an attempt to ensure the levy is “fair and easy to execute”. And he repeated the company’s view that the soft drinks industry had been unfairly “singled out” over the sugar tax.
The government is proposing to introduce two bands of sugar tax, one at 18p per litre for drinks with a sugar content of 5g and over per 100ml, and one at 24p per litre for products with more than 8g of sugar per 100ml.
Mr White said: “We still think it seems somewhat unfair that the government would pick on one specific food group to tax it… outside of taxing other food groups. It still seems unfair, unjust and unreasonable to us that they have pointed their regulatory finger at the one sector that was already doing it.”
Mr White’s comments came as AG Barr delivered a “very solid financial performance” in the 52 weeks ended January 28. It reported revenue up 1.5 per cent to £257.1m and an increase in gross margin of 10 per cent basis points, ending the year with net cash of £9.7m. The company announced a £30m share purchase programme and Mr White noted it was well positioned to consider acquisitions if the right deal came along and to invest in further capital expenditure projects. The major project being undertaken by Barr this year is its £10m investment to add a plastic bottle packing facility at its Milton Keynes site.
A company-wide reorganisation was virtually completed last year, leading to a net loss of 100 jobs and a £3m reduction in overheads.
Mulling the outlook for the current year, Mr White acknowledged the “UK consumer environment remains uncertain”. He added: “We are seeing inflationary pressure as a consequence of sterling’s devaluation coming through. We have taken action ourselves to increase our efficiency and reduce our costs, so that we only have to talk to our customers about minimum levels of pass through of costs. Nonetheless it is happening and we expect that to be a feature of this year.”
The company is proposing a final dividend of 14.4p per share for the year, up eight per cent on last time. Shares in AG Barr closed up nearly four per cent at 568p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here