BOWLEVEN shareholders may have to wait some time for material payouts following the successful campaign by a rebel investor for a boardroom purge, analysts have warned.
Chief executive Kevin Hart and four other directors left the board of Edinburgh-based Bowleven yesterday after shareholders voted for their removal at a general meeting. Two new directors were appointed.
The votes came after Monaco-based Crown Ocean Capital called for the removal of all bar one of Bowleven’s directors. It said Bowleven should be transformed into a holding company which could return excess cash to shareholders.
Bowleven has around $95 million (£77m) cash and interests in the Etinde and Bomono licences in Cameroon.
Crown Ocean has said Bowleven should focus on its 20 per cent interest in Etinde.
In a note headed “Simple in theory harder in practice”, analysts at Barclays said material cash returns by Bowleven were unlikely to be imminent. Bowleven has limited spending commitments but it may be hard to assess how much the company should retain in connection with Etinde.
“A buy-back or equivalent process returning significantly more than the $10m proposed last year … could weaken Bowleven’s negotiating position if it is pursuing an early exit from Etinde,” wrote the analysts.
A resolution to have Bowleven’s chairman, Billy Allan, voted off the board was defeated at Tuesday’s general meeting.
Mr Hart remains chief executive, without having a seat on the board.
Bowleven’s chief operating officer David Clarkson remains on the board.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here