THE activist investor which has been campaigning to clear out the boardroom at oil and gas firm Bowleven is expected to declare victory today.
City sources have confirmed that the results of proxy votes cast by last night confirm that Monaco-based Crown Ocean Capital has gathered enough support for its resolutions to remove all but one of Bowleven’s board of directors, including chief executive Kevin Hart.
It comes after Crown Ocean ramped up its stake in Edinburgh-based Bowleven last week, lifting its voting rights from 17.6 per cent per cent to 22 per cent.
Reports have suggested that Mr Hart, chairman Billy Allan and four other directors will announce their resignations at a general meeting in today. But the company declined to comment.
The results of the resolutions tabled by Crown Ocean will be confirmed at the general meeting in Edinburgh.
Crown Ocean, the single biggest investor in Bowleven, made no further comment yesterday, beyond noting that it would make an announcement after the meeting if the votes go its way.
In January the investment firm, which was co-founded by German financiers Christian Petersmann and Konstantin Stoyanov, delivered a withering assessment of Bowleven’s financial performance as it called for the removal of Mr Hart and five other directors.
Crown Ocean is calling for two new directors – corporate lawyer Christopher Ashworth and turnaround expert Eli Chahin – to be placed on the board, alongside current chief operating officer Dave Clarkson. It wants the company to cut costs and embark on a radically different strategy.
Crown Ocean, which failed in November to have three Bowleven non-executive directors replaced, claimed in January that the “record of shareholder value destruction is evident” at the firm.
It questioned the board’s approach in continuing to run up costs on the Bomono onshore permit in Cameroon - in spite of spending around $100 million on the field “without having shown convincing economic prospects.”
It said at the time: “We do not believe that the board in its current composition is suited to undertake the necessary strategic review or subsequent required actions.”
However, Bowleven has vigorously defended its position by saying that Crown Ocean lacks a strategy to maximise value from its assets in Cameroon.
The company, which in light of the resolutions has announced the support of a range of shareholder advisory groups, has hit back at the “misleading and flawed information” cited by Crown Ocean.
It told investors in January: “The Board believes that the Resolutions, combined with the misleading and flawed information contained in COC’s press release ... are wholly self-serving and represent a blatant attempt by COC to try to attain control of the business.”
Bowleven added: “The existing Board and Company is well-positioned to deliver on its strategy as set out in its recent results and deliver greater value than a break-up and asset strip of the Company would achieve.”
Bowleven, which does not hold any producing assets, announced last week that it had agreed to sell its interest in the Bomono asset in Cameroon. Mr Hart said the farm-in deal, which would see Victoria Oil & Gas acquire an 80 per cent interest in the permit, would allow Bowleven to accelerate the process of realising cash from the discoveries while reducing the cost of bringing them on-stream. However, Victoria has the right to terminate the agreement if any of the nine resolutions requisitioned by Crown Ocean are passed at today’s meeting.
Shares in Bowleven closed up by 2.78 per cent, or 1p, at 35p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here