BOOKMAKER Paddy Power Betfair has revealed costs of last year's merger left it nursing annual losses of £5.7 million, but it saw revenues jump 18 per cent higher after a "transformational" year.
The group - formed after the merger of Paddy Power and online rival Betfair in February 2016 - said cost benefits of the tie-up were ahead of schedule, while the Brexit-hit pound had provided a boost to revenues.
It said that while the bottom line loss showed the merger costs, its underlying results "best reflects" its performance last year, with earnings up 35 per cent at £400m on revenues of £1.55 billion.
Breon Corcoran, chief executive of Paddy Power Betfair, said: "2016 was a transformational year for Paddy Power Betfair with much of the integration of the businesses completed sooner and more efficiently than expected."
The robust underlying performance comes despite a mixed year for bookies, starting with a run of favourites winning at last year's Cheltenham Festival horse race and capped by a string of punter-friendly football results in December.
But Paddy Power said "unfancied" results at the Euro 2016 football tournament last summer helped offset these losses, leaving overall net revenues for the group sportsbook "marginally lower than normal expectations".
Revenues were also helped by a £78m fillip from the pound's plunge since the Brexit vote, which benefited sales from outside the UK when translated into sterling.
With the currency effect stripped out, revenues rose 11 per cent.
Paddy Power, which is preparing for this year's Cheltenham Festival next week, said the new financial year had started in line with forecasts, with group sportsbook stakes so far up 12 per cent on a constant currency basis.
Online stakes are up nine per cent on a constant currency basis and up seven per cent across its betting shops.
But shares fell four per cent, with analysts at Liberum noting a "disappointing" final three months of 2016 for Paddy Power and "operational challenges" ahead.
They said: "It seems likely that operational challenges will continue around the performance of cross-sell to sports customers and the investment required to stimulate growth."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here