Profits at William Hill were dragged down by punter-friendly football and horse racing results last year, but Liverpool's disastrous start to this year is helping the firm bounce back.
The bookmaker said that adjusted operating profit slumped 10% to £261.5 million in the year to December, with William Hill taking a huge hit on Boxing Day.
A total of 18 of the 20 best-backed sides won on the day after Christmas, meaning big payouts at the firm's expense.
One lucky punter turned £20 into £103,000 when an 11-game accumulator bet paid off.
Like other bookmakers, William Hill was also hit after a string of favourites romped home at Cheltenham in March.
Nevertheless, revenue nudged up 1% to £1.6 billion over the period.
Interim chief executive Philip Bowcock said: "2016 was a challenging year for William Hill, but one in which we made considerable operational progress, leaving us well-placed to drive the business forward in 2017."
The company has struggled to cope with the shift to online gambling, but Mr Bowcock said that he is seeing "encouraging signs" in this division, which is now "delivering sustained growth".
William Hill said it has seen favourable sporting results since the new year, with Liverpool's barren run of results helping to drive takings.
Jurgen Klopp's side went 10 games without a victory before finally ending the rot with a 2-0 win over Tottenham earlier this month.
The betting sector is also waiting with baited breath for the conclusion of a government probe that could include a clampdown on betting machines and advertising.
Jason Holden, analyst at Liberum, said: "William Hill endured a very disappointing 2016 and there are no surprises in the results, which are in-line with previously lowered guidance.
"On a more positive note, the recent trends in UK online offer some encouragement but we continue to see an outlook clouded by major uncertainty over the outcome of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport review into gaming machines."
Shares in William Hill rose 2.75% in morning trading to 269p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here