A leading property company has warned that Scottish tax differentials could scare off real estate investors in the economy.
Danny O’Neill founder and chief executive of Ediston, says costs can be higher North of the Border under the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax, and the proposed land tax would make matters worse. “That is not a good thing, because investors are nervous about different taxes on buildings in different locations.”
He went on: “The suggestion by the Scottish Government that councils should tax land that wasn’t developed because developers and housebuilders were holding land back I find astonishing.”
He said developers might hold land as a future development pipeline, but “to suggest we would own land and sit on it and not do anything with it is not how the market works”.
Mr O’Neill added: “Taxing land is a huge risk for the Scottish government and for the market, I hope they reflect on it before making any decisions.”
Rodney Whyte of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, said: “The threat of a tax on development land could actually have the effect of deterring investment in residential development in Scotland, particularly by companies with cross-border operations and opportunities, and may have the effect of reducing the prospects of development of sites particularly those which are marginal.”
Mr Whyte added: “Before consulting on a solution, the Scottish Government must be careful to establish that there is in fact a problem, the scale of that problem and the underlying reasons for it so as not to exaggerate the issue or introduce a potentially disproportionate and counter-productive measure.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel