Leading fund manager Colin McLean has said the UK’s big companies and their shareholders have done little to stamp out rewards for failure.
Mr McLean, co-founder of SVM Asset Management in Edinburgh, has criticised “lengthy remuneration reports, often fudging what actually has been paid and whether targets have been hit.”
He was commenting on the latest PwC survey on FTSE 100 executive pay, which claims there has been a “significant raising of the bar in executive pay”, and says that “on the whole the right balance has been struck”.
But Mr McLean says it is “remarkable” that only 14 of PwC’s sample of 39 company reports in make full disclosure of bonus benchmarks.
“Too many do not disclose numbers to evidence the pay-outs....others rely on a single target indicator. Some high profile FTSE problem companies such as Tesco and Glencore have shown just how well-paid strategic failure can be.”
Mr McLean says one problem may be the make-up of boards, because “many non-executive directors come themselves from a culture of high pay”.
He goes on: “The CEO bonus culture contrasts with lower pay grades; many mid-managers and other employees are expected to perform primarily for base pay, and progress in that..... Some incentive arrangements appear so complex that the consultants and executives involved must have diverted a great deal of time and effort in design and negotiation.”
Mr McLean says bonuses need a radical overhaul. “Measures are simply plucked out of the air with little hard evidence that they work over the longer term. Companies still hide behind their consultants and claims of commercial confidentiality."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here