The competition watchdog has provisionally approved BT's £12.5 billion merger with mobile phone firm EE.
Telecoms giant BT announced in February that it had agreed to acquire EE with the deal expected to be completed next March.
Rivals had questioned whether a deal between the two would weaken competition in the market, but both firms claimed the merger would enable them to invest billions more into Britain's digital economy.
In provisionally clearing the deal, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the companies "operated largely in separate areas".
John Wotton, chairman of the CMA inquiry, said: "The group does not provisionally believe that, in a dynamic and evolving sector, it is more likely than not that BT/EE will be able to use its position to damage competition or the interests of consumers.
"We recognise that this is a merger which is important to many consumers and businesses. We have heard a number of concerns from competitors. After a detailed investigation, our provisional view is that these concerns will not translate into a competition problem in practice."
BT chief executive Gavin Patterson welcomed the CMA's decision, adding that the deal would be "good for the UK, providing investment and ensuring consumers and businesses can benefit from further innovation in a highly competitive market".
The CMA will publish the full findings of its provisional report later this week alongside all other published information relating to the inquiry.
Interested parties will have until November 19 to put forward their response to these provisional findings. The CMA has also set a deadline of "early December" for any other submissions related to the inquiry.
The final report will be published no later than January 18.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here