Facebook users have been warned to check their privacy settings after the social network introduced a new search feature that added nearly two trillion old posts to its archive.
Until now, the search feature on the site focused mainly on groups, events and profile pages, with individual posts difficult to locate this way. However the update will see posts made publicly - as well as entire conversations - visible to anyone on the site via search.
Facebook's vice president of search Tom Stocky announced the update in blog post; "When you search, you'll now see the most recent, relevant public posts along with posts from your friends," he said.
"Search results are organised to help you cut through the noise and quickly understand what the world is saying about a topic in the moment. You also can pull-to-refresh and see the latest public posts."
But the new feature, which has been added to make Facebook more accessible during major live events and to compete with Twitter, has been met with concern that older posts users would prefer did not appear again, could now be located.
Mr Stocky added: "Your search results are personalised and unique to you and, as always, you can only see things that have been shared with you. Likewise, you control who can see your posts on Facebook and it's easy to change the audience of your past posts any time."
However, privacy group Big Brother Watch says the lack of an announcement of the site is unfair on users.
The group's chief executive Renate Samson said: "Once again Facebook have rolled out changes with no clear mention of it on the site.
"Whilst the aim of this change may be to bring Facebook in line with services such as Twitter, users of Facebook may not wish for past posts to be made so public."
Ms Samson added that changing the privacy settings on old posts was more complicated than Facebook suggested.
"The process of hiding your old comments, known as "limiting past posts", is embedded deep in the privacy settings which few users explore unless otherwise directed to do so. This failure to alert users to the change or to the options to restrict their historical posts is disappointing," she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here