James Davey
Supermarket group Asda, the British arm of Wal-Mart, is to accelerate investment in its larger stores and put expansion on hold elsewhere to save money as it seeks to reverse a sharp fall in recent sales.
Britain's "big four" supermarkets, Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury's and Morrisons, have been hurt by a price war as they attempt to stem the loss of shoppers to discounters Aldi and Lidl, and the impact of commodity-led deflation.
Without providing new investment figures Asda said on Monday it would speed up existing plans to reconfigure 95 of its larger stores.
But it will also slow down planned expansions in London, such as small format stores, as well as a programme to develop small outlets at petrol stations.
Asda will put a brake on existing plans to develop remote click and collect sites, while non-core areas such as its business to business sales operation will permanently close in the next few months.
"We need to simplify what we do by prioritising the first line of our strategy -- improving our core business - and pausing activity in other areas so that we are not spread too thinly," said Chief Executive Andy Clarke.
All the big four supermarket groups have been lowering prices. But Asda was the first, saying in November 2013 it would spend 1 billion pounds ($1.6 billion) on cuts over five years. In February, Asda separately said it would invest an additional 600 million pounds on stores this year.
Asda's sales performance has deteriorated significantly in 2015, with the firm reporting like-for-like sales declines of 3.9 percent in its first quarter and 4.7 percent in its second quarter.
The second quarter outcome, Asda's worst performance in the 16 years it has been owned by Wal-Mart, was described by Clarke as the firm's "nadir". However, recent industry data has shown little improvement.
Last week Asda lured Roger Burnley, a top executive from rival Sainsbury's, to be its new chief operating officer, Clarke's deputy and his most likely successor as CEO.
Separately last week Wal-Mart warned on profit, blaming higher spend on wages and e-commerce and lower prices, sending its shares down 10 percent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here