CALUM BREWSTER of Barclays
Is that it? Are markets now ready to move on from some of the gloom that characterised the third quarter?
We’ve argued for some time that the pessimism implicit in large parts of the world’s capital markets has looked inconsistent with incoming data on the world economy, which remains mixed but far from disastrous for the moment. We still suspect the current economic cycle has further to travel. Jitters around China’s lumpy slowdown, US monetary policy and assorted other unknowns will surely return and we’ve long warned that we’re likely closer to the next US recession than the last.
Of course, the consensus very rarely gets the timing right – many of those confidently predicting an imminent global recession in the last month are the same talking heads who have been doing the same for much of the last several years. This doesn’t mean these perennial doom-mongers can’t be right this time, but with important leading indicators pointing in the opposite direction, towards continued growth, we see clients still being best served by tilting diversified portfolios towards equities.
While the US ISM Manufacturing Index has been trending lower over recent months, the latest reading still sits at a level consistent with growth in the US manufacturing sector and economy. Historically, a reading above 43.1 tends to be consistent with continued growth, while past data has shown that it is not uncommon for the index to dip below 50 even in non-recessionary periods. It will take a further meaningful decline before we start questioning the robustness of the US economy. This week’s data on China’s foreign exchange reserves helped to settle a few nerves, though reserves will remain closely watched for signs of accelerated capital flight over coming months.
At times of stress, the urge to widen our net and pay more attention to data series and news flow that would usually pass us by – from Chinese noodle prices to quarterly corporate outlook statements – becomes significantly harder to resist. On the other side, market turbulence tends to diminish the airtime available for more balanced, sober analysis in favour of more determinedly gloomy perspectives. The combination of the two can exert a powerful, albeit more often than not temporary, pressure on capital markets. This is not to suggest that there is no substance in such fears. Just that sometimes, tuning out much of the noise and remembering that there remains as much, if not more, cause for optimism as there is for pessimism can provide profitable investment opportunities.
Investors would be wise to expect further tests of their composure ahead. Weak inventories and strong imports seem likely to see Q3 US GDP come in below two per cent, which may worry some; meanwhile, the Chinese economic slowdown will likely contain plenty of further bumps in the road yet. US politics may also be worth keeping an eye on in coming months, along with the mass of events and news flow that remain as yet unknowable, both good and bad. However, there is so far insufficient evidence that the next US and global recession is imminent, in our opinion. This means that we still see clients with appropriate risk appetite being best served by tilting their investment portfolios towards equities and away from bonds.
For their part bonds, particularly the higher quality government and corporate issues, may well stay expensive for a while yet. The Federal Reserve is clearly in no hurry to raise interest rates and durably perkier inflation may well continue to look a distant prospect until we see US wages rise. However, even if the Federal Reserve does indeed leave the first interest rate rise till next year and we are left waiting longer for a slightly less subdued inflation outlook, the contribution of high quality government and corporate credit to investment portfolio performance is likely to be small, from these levels.
Calum Brewster is MD Wealth & Investment Management for Barclays' North Region
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here