SCOTBEEF owner JW Galloway has moved back into the black after cattle prices returned to normal levels as memories of the horsemeat scandal faded.
The latest accounts for JW Galloway show the group made £4.4 million pre tax profit in the 52 weeks to 1 March after losing £2.9m in the preceding period.
The privately owned company has said it had to absorb a sharp rise in cattle prices as a consequence of the scandal in 2013.
JW Galloway noted retailers did not want to pass the increased costs on to customers.
Scotbeef is thought to be the largest red meat company in Scotland but faces challenges in the UK retail market, which directors describe as very competitive and price sensitive.
In Scotbeef’s accounts for the 52 weeks to 1 March the company says: “After the unprecedented increase in livestock costs in the previous financial year there was a return to more historic and seasonal cost levels.”
The cost reduction powered a big increase in profitability for during a year when group turnover fell slightly, to £308m from £309m in the preceding period.
Export sales remained robust despite economic uncertainty in the European Union area and the strength of the pound against the euro.
JW Galloway says it supplies meat to 20 European countries through its Scotbeef and Vivers Scotlamb operations.
Scotbeef has three sites in the Central Belt.
The company says the plant at its headquarters in Bridge of Allan, Stirlingshire, boasts one of the country's most modern beef slaughter, chilling, and boning facilities. It can process 2,500 cattle per week. Separate facilities can handle 11,000 lambs per week.
Vivers Scotlamb has a plant in Dornock, Dumfries and Galloway, with a slaughter capacity of 15,000 lambs per week.
Owned by the Galloway family, the group employed an average of 964 people in the latest financial year, up from 942 in the preceding period.
The total boardroom paybill fell to £574,000, from £615,000 in the preceding year.
The highest paid director earned £217,000 aggregate emoluments, down from £245,000.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel