NEXT, the UK's second-largest clothing retailer by sales value, said it would need to raise its prices to pay for an increase in the minimum wage, becoming the latest company to warn on the impact of the British government's policy.
Chancellor George Osborne in July announced a pay increase for the country's lowest-paid workers to counter criticism the benefits of economic recovery have not been shared out fairly.
The hourly minimum wage will rise from next April to 7.20 pounds ($11.1) for those aged over 25, from 6.50 pounds now, and to about 9.35 pounds an hour by 2020.
Next said that the total cost of the higher minimum wage, which the government has renamed the living wage, would be 27 million pounds ($41.6 million) a year, and that it would need to increase its prices by 1 percent to compensate for that cost.
Earlier this week Whitbread, which owns the Costa Coffee chain and is one of Britain's biggest employers, said it faced a big rise in costs due to the wage reform and would probably take on fewer extra staff.
Cleaning services firm Interserve said its 2016 margins could take a hit of up to 15 million pounds, while Mears , a care worker company, said the cost of meeting the higher wage bill would be up to 5 million pounds.
Britain's independent Office for Budget Responsibility has estimated the new minimum wage will result in 60,000 fewer jobs and projected the cost to business would amount to 1 percent of corporate profits.
Publishing its half-year results earlier on Thursday, Next said its profit rose 7.1 percent to 347.1 million pounds in the six months to July after it sold more products than expected at full price.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel