DANA Petroleum has plunged deep into the red as it slashed the value of its North Sea business to reflect the sharp fall in the oil price.
Accounts for the Korean-owned oil and gas firm show it made a £285 million loss after tax in 2014 compared with a £105m profit in the preceding year.
The loss was stated after Dana recorded a £129m impairment charge against the value of producing assets in the UK, Norway, Netherlands and Egypt, which it said reflected the significant drop in Brent crude prices in the second half of 2014.
Korea National Oil Corporation bought Dana for £1.9bn in 2010, giving it control of a big portfolio of producing assets focused on the North Sea amassed by that company under the leadership of Tom Cross.
Dana saw income fall by around £320m in 2014, to £680m from £1 billion, partly reflecting the drop in the oil price last year. After recovering some ground in spring, in advance of the US driving season, the price of Brent crude has fallen again in recent weeks amid abundant supplies and muted demand.
Brent crude traded at around $49 per barrel yesterday compared with $115 in June last year.
In the accounts directors said Dana completed a significant restructuring in 2014 against a backdrop of operational challenges, particularly in the UK and oil price volatility.
The expected start of production from the flagship Western Isles development off Shetland has been put back to 2017 from 2015 and the project budget has increased to $2bn from $1.6bn following what Dana described as major delays in the engineering stage.
Dana’s average production fell to 41,637 barrels oil equivalent daily from 46,891 boed in 2013. It cited ongoing field decline in late life assets, extended shut downs in one area and poorer than expected reservoir performance on two UK fields.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here