ROYAL Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group stood out among the big five UK-based players in their sector by achieving a rise in profitability last year, analysis by accountancy firm KPMG has concluded.
The five biggest UK banks achieved a 62 per cent or £7.9 billion hike in combined pre-tax profits to £20.6bn in 2014, from £12.7bn in the prior year, KPMG has calculated in its latest sector benchmarking report, 'A Paradox of Forces', published today.
This rise in combined profits was largely the result of RBS having booked a statutory operating profit before tax, which excludes results from discontinued operations, of £2.64bn for last year, compared with a loss of £8.85bn at this level in 2013. This 2014 profit figure for RBS excludes a £4bn write-down on US operation Citizens, which has been floated on the New York Stock Exchange.
Lloyds Banking Group, which owns Bank of Scotland and is, like RBS, backed by the UK taxpayer, achieved a rise in its bottom line pre-tax profits from £415m in 2013 to £1.76bn last year.
The KPMG report, which covers HSBC, Barclays, and Standard Chartered as well as RBS and Lloyds, also concluded that the UK banking sector "must urgently tackle a low return on equity".
Publishing its findings, KPMG says: "None of the banks surveyed achieved a return on equity of more than eight per cent, compared with an average 11.6 per cent in 2009.
"The report paints a picture of divergent performance across the banks as they begin to reshape their business plans. For example, profitability at the two state-backed banks continued to rise whereas it fell at the three global banks."
Contemplating the question of why it had been the state-backed banks which had improved profitability last year, a spokesman for KPMG said: "It was just a pure coincidence. We couldn't find any causality on that. They are so unique in any instance."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article