SHARES in Glasgow-based engineering company Weir Group plunged 3.6% yesterday after an influential analyst downgraded its stance on the company due to low gas prices.
Weir Group has seen its share price rise more than 160% since the beginning of 2010, in part due to expectations that it will benefit from demand from the growing yet controversial fracking industry in which water, chemicals and sand are blasted into a shaft to crack rock and release gas.
Analyst Glen Liddy said: "Given the low natural gas price in the US and high gas inventories, we expect the perceived increased uncertainty about near-term demand for fracking equipment to weigh on the share price (and increase volatility) given the high valuation multiples that Weir trades on."
However, JP Morgan Cazenove has dropped its recommendation on the company from "overweight" to "neutral". It still expects the company to post double-digit earnings growth over the next two years.
There has been a rise in fracking recently in the US, where oil and gas firms are investing heavily in developing "unconventional" hydrocarbon sources.
However, a price fall could make some potential sites uneconomic.
In response Weir's shares closed at 1884p, down 70p on the day, giving up the gains they had made from mid-December. JPMorgan retains a 2300p price target for the stock.
Mr Liddy added: "We expect the order inflow for the oil & gas division to see a marked slowdown in the near-term. Long-term outlook remains bright."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article