RADIOACTIVE (12A)
Rosamund Pike repeatedly sparks but never quite catches fire as a trailblazer who illuminated 20th-century science in Academy Award nominee Marjane Satrapi's biographical drama.
Unfolding largely in flashback, Radioactive celebrates the triumphs of Polish physicist and chemist Marie Curie nee Sklodowska at a time when a woman's place was supposedly in a sitting room or kitchen, not a laboratory.
Pike's stirring performance tightly embraces the character's nervous tics and forthright manner - "This is my fight and I will win it!" Marie vows defiantly - to suggest how a rebel with a cause could prove her doubters wrong in the crucible of misplaced macho superiority.
She kindles a pleasing on-screen chemistry with Sam Riley as the man who stood beside Marie on her momentous journey until he fell beneath the wheels of a horse-drawn carriage, which Satrapi recreates with horrifying flair.
Screenwriter Jack Thorne arms his plain-speaking heroine with choice one-liners to reflect her no-nonsense approach to diplomacy.
His decision to intercut fraught human drama with historical milestones fashioned from Marie's discoveries - the 1945 Hiroshima bombing, the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear reactor failure - feels unnecessary and reduces dramatic momentum to a crawl.
Satrapi's film opens in 1934 Paris with the collapse of two-time Nobel Prize winner Marie Curie (Pike), supposedly as a result of long-term exposure to radiation in the course of her scientific endeavours.
As she drifts in and out of consciousness on a hospital gurney bound for the operating theatre, Marie recalls her first meeting with fellow scientist Pierre Curie (Riley) on the streets of the French capital in 1893.
"I feel it's worth pointing out that I will not be your mistress," she tersely informs him.
He offers her a place in his laboratory to continue her groundbreaking research, which has put her at odds with peers in the scientific community, including Gabriel Lippmann (Simon Russell Beale).
Marie and Pierre marry and the Curies make a series of scientific breakthroughs, which confirm Marie as the first woman to win a coveted Nobel Prize.
"Fame is for idiots," Marie dismissively remarks to her sister Bronia (Sian Brooke) as her celebrity status intoxicates the upper echelons of power in the city.
Following Pierre's death, Marie embarks on a scandalous affair with his brilliant pupil, Paul Langevin (Aneurin Barnard), which poisons public opinion.
Subsequently, Marie risks everything, including her health, with her spirited daughter Irene (Anya Taylor-Joy) to change the face of science.
Radioactive is a patchy history lesson which fails to emit the same mesmerising glow as the vial of radium that Marie takes to bed each night.
Pike is compelling but we are kept at arm's length from the brilliant mind who dismantled gender barriers.
"I have been surrounded by death and radiation, and they have brought me very little happiness," observes Marie towards the end of her life.
Satrapi's picture inspires a slightly more favourable response.
THE TRUTH (PG)
Released: March 20 (UK & Ireland, selected cinemas)
Award-winning Japanese director Hirokazu Kore-eda ventures to France to make his first feature outside of his homeland and elicits an eye-catching central performance from Catherine Deneuve.
She plays Fabienne Dangeville, a grand dame of French cinema, who has a Cesar on the mantelpiece and commands the adoration of countrymen and women for her performances on the big screen.
Fabienne is poised to release a memoir entitled The Truth as she prepares for her next film.
Hitting the campaign trail to promote the book, Fabienne plays host to her screenwriter daughter Lumir (Juliette Binoche) and her actor husband Hank (Ethan Hawke).
They arrive from New York with their young daughter Charlotte (Clementine Grenier).
As Lumir reads her mother's book, she is staggered by the extent of Fabienne's deception, trotting out rose-tinted anecdotes that never happened to polish her public image.
The divide between reality and fiction forces the two women to address their differences and seek common ground if they are to move forward with their relationship.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here