RSNO/Reif
Glasgow Royal Concert Hall
Keith Bruce
five stars
THE Benedetti effect meant that the Concert Hall was packed to the rafters, and the average age of the RSNO’s Saturday night audience reduced by about a decade thanks to the presence of many young followers of the violinist. There was no children’s menu on offer, however — this was a meaty programme, and Nicola Benedetti far from the only star on the platform.
Young German conductor Christian Reif has already built a formidable reputation on the west coast of America as well as across Europe, and from the way he handled the Shostakovich Festive Overture that opened the programme it was immediately clear why. He took the work at a very brisk pace, but it was a model of clarity both in his direction and the playing of the musicians, from the crisp brass at the beginning. Reif is a big chap, who conducts with the flair of a fencing instructor, and his expressive hands and quick baton were in every corner of the orchestra.
Come the Sibelius Violin Concerto, it was just as apparent that the conductor and soloist had a good rapport, but there was also something new and special in the forged precision of Benedetti’s performance. From the carefully measured opening, through the early cadenza to her dialogue with first viola Tom Dunn in the lengthy first movement, each note was particularly distinct even in the fastest virtuoso passages. By the tuneful finale, it was undeniable that her playing seemed less “gutsy” than previously, and was all the more compelling for that.
The orchestral winds that were similarly poised at the start of the concerto’s slow movement had plenty further opportunity to shine in Mussorgsky’s Pictures at an Exhibition in the second half. The Russian composer’s tunes and clever sequencing are only half the story of course, with Maurice Ravel’s exceptional orchestration just as crucial to the work’s popularity. Once again the RSNO brass were on masterly form, and Chris Hart, Davur Magnusson and their colleagues won deserved cheers from the large audience at the end.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here