Theatre
Divided
Oran Mor, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
****
WITH a glass of whisky to hand, yer man RD Laing (Billy Mack) is waxing vaunty about ... himself. It’s the 60s, he’s been rated number three in a top ten list of ‘mind-doctors’ - only Freud and Jung are ahead, and they’re dead already.
There’s only one cloud on his blues-skies horizon: the current woman in his life, Jutta, has left him and he’s hoping every phone call is from her.
But when the phone rings, it’s one of his two Glasgow daughters, Karen - would he? could he? come and visit, because she has some news she needs to share. And here is where writer Ian Pattison introduces us to Laing, who can write, at best-selling length, about the far-reaching dynamics of family life, even as he’s failing as a father to his own children - one of whom, Susie, is fatally ill with leukaemia.
The irony of all this is beyond painful: how could Laing, with his high-flying reputation for radical, empathetic treatments of schizophrenics, be so physically and emotionally distanced from his own flesh and blood?
Laing’s monologues, full of bizarre biographical details and droll anecdotes, shade in the circumstances that shaped him. Mack, dapper in black, delivers these with the showman’s flair - bordering on arrogant swagger - that allowed Laing to function so successfully in his career.
That same, self-serving performance no longer blinds Karen to his flaws. Nonetheless his absentee indifference to their poverty wouldn’t matter to Karen (Eva Traynor, touchingly stalwart) if only he would be there for ailing Susie (Sarah Miele, who lights up so poignantly when he does arrive).
Claire Prenton’s direction wisely opts for nuances rather than histrionics: her cast - with Mack deftly reviving the role he created in 2013 - make us well aware of the complex hurts, defence mechanisms and vulnerabilities barely contained under their characters’ skins, make us aware, too, of the daughters’ ongoing love that accepted Laing’s divisive self.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here