My Last Supper: One Meal, One Lifetime in the Making
Jay Rayner
Faber & Faber, £16.99
Review by Cate Devine
BY his own admission, speculating about what one would eat as one’s last meal is nothing new. But that doesn’t stop the infamously trenchant Jay Rayner from storming in and owning the idea – albeit ahead of his own time.
“Last suppers are the culinary idea to end all ideas,” he writes. “But they are wasted on the very people who are the most eligible for them. This seemed to me extremely unfair. I was excluded from enjoying this blissful meal by the piffling detail of not actually being that close to death.”
So at age 52 he sets out to stage his own last supper, and after 20 years as the Observer’s restaurant critic, he has accrued enough food memories to construct the “death row dinner” to end them all.
Grabbing the reader by the thrapple with an urgent narrative that invokes his commanding voice on Radio 4’s Kitchen Cabinet, the pace is such that any protestations are kept at bay. As we cross the globe in search of his favoured butter, bread, oysters, snails, alcohol, pig, salad, chips, Mont Blanc dessert and sparking water, Rayner proves a gifted raconteur. Anecdotes trip off the tongue as easily melted lard, many unrelated to his current career: he revisits early journalistic commissions, childhood and his own near-death experiences.
Part memoir, part confessional, part exercise in shameless name-dropping (a habit that will have other food writers gnashing their teeth in career-death desperation) My Last Supper is a tour de force of spectacular storytelling.
That the author has a voracious appetite is not – never has been – in question. Neither is his gift for provocation. Among his acerbic apercus about fashionable food intolerances and hipster producers he clearly enjoys identifying as a Jew who likes pig. In a pork scratchings factory, he observes the slipperiness of the floor where the “boiled-down pig” has become ingrained. With colleagues he enjoys a “huge carnival of feet and ears and noses and spleens”, noting that “mouth-coating oiliness makes me happy”.
The slightly nauseating obsession with eating is alleviated by humour and pathos. There are echoes of Woody Allen as Rayner recalls being invited by a group of Lubavitch Jews to witness the coming of the Messiah in New York while covering the Brooklyn riots. The Messiah in question turns out to be a 91-year-old multiple stroke victim who is now mute, deaf and going blind. His bodyguards simply shrug and say, ‘Meh, maybe next year’ as they wheel him off.
Rayner puts his lifelong battle with weight down to being a “Shtetl Jew, with a metabolism built for winter on the Russian steppes when the Cossacks are coming”. His waistline passed the 40-inch mark in his early teens. He had weak ankles and fallen arches; a genetic tendency to varicose veins, combined with that weight, meant that his “calves bloomed with peaks both green and purples” before he was 15.
He offers plenty of socio-psychological observations, wondering for example why a death-row inmate would choose Diet Coke as his last drink, and what the difference is between comfort eating and overeating. I’m guessing this is a trait inherited from his late mother Claire, the celebrated agony aunt.
After all the bluster, the final meal itself – no spoilers – at first seems underwhelming. But it’s a convivial event that celebrates love, friendship, music and the making of new memories. And therein lies the crux of the issue. What otherwise is the point of eating at all? The killer coda is that Rayner’s best friend cannot attend because he is dying; his real-time last meal is eaten without him. It’s a moving echo of Rayner’s dying father Des, who could not eat the last meal his son had so lovingly sourced for him.
So thanks for the ride, Mr Rayner. And thanks for ruining this brilliant idea for everyone else.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here