Theatre
Casablanca (the lunchtime cut)
Oran Mor, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
five stars
Raves to the right of it, plaudits to the left of it and now – in the middle of this Play, Pie and a Pint 500 season – Casablanca:the Gin Joint Cut, returns to Oran Mor in a special lunchtime version that, if anything, feels even nattier and fizzingly fun-tastic than the slightly longer original from 2010.
Of all the plays, in all the fifteen years and 30 seasons, this won the PPP’s People’s Choice Vote - the current revival is now the 500th play to be staged since the start of the late David MacLennan’s lunchtime initiative. In truth, not every PPP production has risen to the heights of writer/director Morag Fullarton’s tongue-in-cheek hommage to Michael Curtiz’s 1942 Hollywood classic, Casablanca.
As time has gone by, the rollicking three-hander has done two Edinburgh Fringes and toured to Paris, London, Barbados – and Dunoon. Mostly with the same cast of Gavin Mitchell, Clare Waugh and Jimmy Chisholm as the unabashed thesps who conjure up Bogart, Bergman and many others within the cluttered confines of Rick’s Bar.
This time round, however, Chisholm’s commitments mean that Kevin Lennon has stepped into the shoes – and jackets and hats – of five characters ranging from slightly effeminate French captain Louis Renaud to resistance fighter Victor Lazlo by way of the crooked Ugarte.
With accents changing as quickly as his characters’ costumes, Lennon keeps well-timed pace with Mitchell and Waugh as they negotiate Fullarton’s precisely engineered switches of tone from spoof to serious drama, the latter underpinned by the factual asides that provide a wartime context to Casablanca the movie. It’s a total joy. We laugh, in sheer delight, at Mitchell’s urbane Bogart, forced by today’s ‘No smoking’ regulations to mime Rick’s laconic cigarettes. And we chortle at Waugh’s sudden shift from Bergman’s limpid Ilsa into rampant-barking Nazi Major. Not a trick is ever missed here, whether it’s a moment of arch farce or a genuinely tender glance.
Keep playing it, folks…
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here