Jane Haining was a farmer’s daughter from Galloway who paid with her life for standing up to the Nazis during the Second World War. Her care for Jewish children in Budapest, her humanity and courage led to her arrest, imprisonment and death in Auschwitz concentration camp in 1944. In a new book, Jane Haining: A Life of Love and Courage, Mary Miller tells the story of a remarkable woman.
As we read the story of Jane Haining and the Scottish Mission to the Jews in Budapest, we should give some thought to Scottish history and culture. Scotland unreflectively shared in fifteen hundred years of antisemitism in Europe – ‘institutional antisemitism’ that was embedded in the Christian culture to the extent that most people were probably unaware of it. From the early nineteenth century, among the European churches there was a movement to evangelise the Jews, in which the churches in Scotland enthusiastically shared. It had the best of intentions and yet continued to imply that Jews were somehow alien, inadequate and in need of conversion by those of a superior faith. The extent to which this unconsidered assumption eventually made it possible for the Nazis to regard the Jews and other minorities as less than human, and therefore to subject them to mass murder on a previously unimaginable scale, is impossible to measure.
The way in which the ‘superior’ approach changed, in the Scottish Mission to the Jews in Budapest, is one of the themes of this book. As the appalling reality of what was happening in the 1930s and 1940s became evident, a courageous core of members of the Scottish Mission increasingly abandoned dogma in favour of common humanity. Jane and the majority of her Hungarian colleagues, both Jews and non-Jews, defied the compromises to which many felt forced under hostile occupation. They chose to resist, and for her resistance Jane Haining eventually was rightly recognised by the state of Israel as ‘Righteous among the Nations’.
Her story is important because it reminds us that, whatever the circumstances, ordinary people can and should make that choice.
May 1944
On 12 or 13 May, Jane Haining was dispatched in a cattle truck to Auschwitz, and the world as she had known it was obliterated for her.
The Auschwitz records state that according to her prisoner number Jane arrived there on 15 May 1944, in a transport of thirty-one Hungarian Jews. Until the Germans invaded Hungary in March of that year, Hungarian Jews had not yet been transported en masse to the death camps. They had harboured hopes that their situation was different and they would not be subjected to the full range of Nazi atrocities against them. It appears that at the beginning of May most Hungarian Jews genuinely did not yet know the real purpose of the ‘work camps’ of which they had heard rumours, and the fate that awaited them there. The Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel writes in his book Night of how a rare escapee from an army massacre, returning to his small town of Sighet near Budapest, tried to warn his fellow Jews and urged them to flee, but they simply could not believe him. They thought he had gone mad.
Once Hungary was occupied, Hitler swiftly set about changing this anomalous situation. Adolf Eichmann was sent to Budapest to take charge personally of an operation that even now challenges belief and defies imagination. Between the middle of May and the end of July 1944, more than 12,000 Hungarian Jews per day were deported to Auschwitz, where the great majority were murdered in the gas chambers immediately after arrival.
The Nazi death camps, of which Auschwitz was the largest, have acquired a reputation for efficiency and order. Their bureaucracy and organisation functioned across the whole of Europe to bring about the relocation and destruction of six million innocent people. In relation to Jane Haining herself, it is hard to believe the grotesque ‘efficiency’ that delivered a death certificate in her name to the Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs only a month after her death. Still more bizarrely, a few days after that a police officer delivered by hand to the Scottish Mission a bundle of the papers that had been seized from Jane’s room on the day of her arrest.
And yet the mask of efficiency covering the operation of the death camps was in many ways a sham. The thin veneer of bureaucratic correctness covered the reality that the camp was a deranged, brutal, chaotic world in which prisoners lived or died at the whim of a guard.
For the disposal of the 430,000 Hungarian prisoners sent to Auschwitz–Birkenau between May and July 1944, the five ‘efficiently’ constructed gas chambers and crematoria were grotesquely inadequate. The reality was that many waited for hours outside, or were stacked post-mortem for later disposal, or were thrown alive into the flames of the additional pits that had been dug to act as pyres consuming the ‘overflow’ from the official system.
It was into this world that Jane was plunged on 15 May 1944.
…
On 15 July, Jane managed to write a lettercard to Margit Prém. The next day, perhaps she failed a ‘selection’. Perhaps she knowingly or unknowingly broke a camp rule or displeased a guard. Perhaps, with the numbers pouring in, the camp was now too full, or maybe her card simply reached the top of the pile. At any rate, on 17 July she was taken to Birkenau, to be murdered in the gas chamber.
This edited extract is taken from Mary Miller’s introduction and a later chapter describing what Jane encountered in Auschwitz. Jane Haining: A Life of Love and Courage by Mary Miller (Birlinn, £14.99) is published in April. Mary Miller will speak about Jane Haining on 3 April at Queen’s Park Govanhill Parish Church (6.30pm), events@birlinn.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here