Agatha & the Truth of Murder
Channel 5
Do you know the biggest problem with Agatha & the Truth of Murder? The fact it was broadcast at 9pm, Sunday the 23rd of December, and not a week earlier.
If it had aired the previous Sunday, I’d have been able to publish this review a few tantalising days before Christmas.
Meaning I could have written the following: ‘Agatha & the Truth of Murder… it’s a real Christmas turkey.’
At which point, thousands of delighted Herald readers would have sighed in unison, then muttered to themselves: “Now that’s what I call quality journalism. An appropriately festive metaphor, cunningly weaponised to disparage a cheap and shoddy TV film.”
Alas, Christmas has vanished, leaving me with no topical allusion to explain how awful Agatha was.
Let me, instead, describe the debacle in dubious detail…
First, though, I’ll concede Agatha had an excellent premise. Though, regrettably, not an original one.
The story’s based on a curious event in Agatha Christie’s life, when she went missing for ten days in 1926. The mystery of where she went – and why – has never been solved.
A sound starting point for a story. Which is exactly what Dustin Hoffman and Vanessa Redgrave thought, back in 1979, when they agreed to star in Agatha, a movie about the incident.
Both actors were at the height of their fame, so the film didn’t exactly slip under the radar.
Yet here comes Channel 5, decades later, hobbling in the wake of Hollywood’s elegant footsteps.
To be fair, this version has an added twist, connecting Christie’s disappearance with another real-life mystery, the murder of Florence Nightingale’s niece. (Also called Florence.)
In this story, the writer (played by Ruth Bradley) disappears in order to solve the crime.
Her method of doing so is preposterous. Like Clark Kent, she disguises her true identity by the crafty application of a pair of spectacles. Then she rounds up a bunch of suspects in a country house (cos, that’s what they do in Christie novels, yeah?) and sets about unearthing the villain.
None of this works, even as gentle escapism on a slumberous Sunday evening.
The mystery has none of the intricate plotting that made Christie’s fiction popular, and the dialogue is clunky, clumsy and inauthentic.
We’re meant to be in the early years of the 20th century, yet Agatha talks about ‘fans’ of her novels.
YouTubers have fans. Genteel crime-writers of the 1920s had a readership.
At one point, Christie’s husband says something is “bollocks”.
I half expected him to leap on a skateboard and yell to his wife: “Laters, homey.”
Arthur Conan Doyle turns up, too, with a propensity for cheating at golf.
Oscar Slater’s saviour? Louche on the links? As if.
All of which leaves one mystery left unsolved.
The mystery of why Channel 5 believed Agatha was ever fit for broadcast.
By Lorne Jackson
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel