The latest injection of transparency on MPs’ “outside interests” ie second jobs again reveals that some honourable members are getting paid for doing absolutely nothing.
Jimmy Hood, Labour’s champion for Lanark and Hamilton East, has listed in the MPs’ register of financial interests how for the last three months he has been paid as a parliamentary consultant to Scottish Coal. However, when it comes to time worked for his monthly £625, Mr Hood lists for July, August and September “hours worked nil”. His annual fee is £7500.
However, when it comes to being paid for nothing ex-Environment Secretary John Gummer appears to take the chocolate biscuit. Last month, it was reported how the Suffolk MP was paid £1,666.66 gross for a 20-minute board meeting, which he attended “by phone”. However, in the latest edition of the register he is reported as having received £3,562.50 gross, stating hours worked “nil”.
Today’s Cabinet ran over a range of issues, including expenses, with the debate led by Harriet Harman and Nick Brown. The PM’s spokesman decided this was one subject he did not want to give details about. Corridor talk suggests GB is none to pleased with the big H as she has taken a decidely different line on the Legg issue. While the PM insists MPs should shut up and pay up, his loyal deputy has advised colleagues to query any discrepancies and warned the ex-Whitehall mandarin against making any abitrary decisions.
The Kelly report on reforming the expenses system is due out early in November as is the Legg report. However, given the widespread disgruntlement among honourable members, miffed at Sir Thomas’s decisions, and their intention to query figures and even appeal, then the chances are that the Legg report might not appear until the New Year. In other words, the expenses agony for MPs will continue for weeks and months, getting perilously close to the general election campaign, which Messrs Brown and Cameron want to avoid as much as possible.
One final point mentioned by a seasoned parliamentarian is that what all this mess is having on the calibre of people at Westminster. We already know that many experienced MPs are standing down at the next election. Once the Kelly report is out and possibly recommends MPs not employing spouses and says they should only rent second homes in London or even have to live in communal accommodation, then this particular politician feels that even more old hacks will bail out ahead of the next election. Which means that the next parliament will look unrecognisable to this one with virtually no old faces.
Now this, of course, may be necessary to purge parliament but it might leave the place bereft of experienced hands. The seasoned parliamentarian’s argument being that government, opposition and politics in general could be the worse for it. Time will tell.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article